Congratulations!

That’s terrific, June. Congratulations!

Yay! That’s great news. I don’t know that I’d know what I was reading if I tried but I’ll take a look.

Quite an accomplishment!!!

So, this would include things like my being misdiagnosed many times or more specific things like the lab error that said DD would have Downs?

Congrats! I work as an MT for the Neuro Fdn. at Childrens Hospital in Boston, I’d be interested in reading the whole article if its possible.

Congratulations!

Yay June! I think I can honestly say this is the first time I’ve been HAPPY to read an abstract of a journal at my old job (which was putting STM journals online, including Chest, hahaha)! I will probably even read the article, too, as it’s an interesting topic. I totally smiled at the PubMed content box link “Articles by Oshiro, J.” Yay!

Congratulations! That’s certainly worth bragging about! also – love the title.

The science notwithstanding, I’m sure it was very well written and edited, based on your writing here on your blog. My boyfriend is earning his PhD at the U of MN, and he has to read a lot of technical papers, and many of them aren’t written very well, which makes the technical stuff a little harder to digest, I’m told.

Way to go, June!

Congratulations!! What a fabulous accomplishment!

That’s excellent – Champagne all around!

Congratulations on the publication of your paper! I bet that feels great, you should buy some yarn to celebrate. I love your blog by the way!

Woo! Go June! Your first post-grad publication *is* a big fat deal. And it’s an important topic, too. Congratulations.

Wonderful! Good for you!

Congratulations! That is a wonderful accomplishment. Definitely something to feel pride about and perhaps boast a bit!

Congratulations! I was just listening the other day to an author of book _How Doctors Think_ and he talked about misdiagnoses and it was an interesting interview. I would like to read more of the article if I could.

Congratulations! That’s a big milestone, to be sure. Chest is a good journal.

June PhD. Yeah, baby.

Well done! And it’s a good title too.

Congratulations!

Wow, that sounds interesting and very important. Way to go!

Yay!!! Congratulations!

Congrats!!!

fantastic!!!!!

Congratulations!

Congrats!

I’m a little behind on my blog reading but wanted to add my congratulations. CONGRATULATIONS!!!!

Way to go! I remember my first “real” publication— what a high!

:) kate

That is WONDERFUL! Congrats to you. You should be really really proud of that accomplishment, as it is no small one.

How wonderful! Congratulations. But I really missed your blog. I turn to it as soon as I get into the office.

Congratulations — you are A Star!

Wonderful news. It’s a great feeling to see your name in print!

Excellent! I know how much work goes into getting something publication-ready. I’m also impressed by the subject. It’s a hard-to-swallow topic, and to press it forward requires a team that’s technically astute, super sharp, and ultra diplomatic. That you’ve been successful is a tribute to your skills in MANY areas. Go forth and fight for right! (Or at least accountability, analysis. prediction, and planned mitigation). Firmly in your cheering section – k.

Congrats June! Can you send me the pdf? I’d love to read it. ~B

Congratulations! I think Kim said it all but I’ll add a small woohoo.

Congrats on the paper. It’s a scary topic.

On another topic, I note “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” is on your reading list. I heard part of an interview about this book on NPR some time back and I’ve been curious ever since. What are your thoughts — is this a book worth buying, or is it best obtained from the library?

That’s great! Congratulations! I like the title.

I also wanted to drop by and tell you thanks for the nifty DNA cable pattern. I recently used it in making a vest for my dad.

This is very cool! You know I work with scientists, the biological type. I read the abstract thinking it would too uber-geeky for me, but I found the premise fascinating. Nice work and congratulations!

Congratulations!

Congratulations, June! That was an interesting article. You know, I read an article some time within the last year or so (maybe in Medscape?) about a study where they found patients were less likely to sue doctors who had made mistakes if the doctors admitted they made a mistake and apologized. Everyone makes a mistake now and then, and that’s forgivable, but no one wants to be lied to.